/loopdocslow riskintermediatesafety C · 55Forward Futurepre-dates current gate · under review

Close the gaps before you build

Fill documentation gaps until requirements, technical design, acceptance criteria, and test strategy describe one buildable system.

prompt
→ Claude
Prepare [project] for implementation. Ensure its documents cover requirements, technical design, tasks with acceptance criteria, and test strategy. Each round, fix the largest gap or contradiction that could make two competent engineers build different systems. Keep details traceable, record assumptions, and ask before product forks. Recheck consistency, then have two independent reviewers describe the components, data model, dependencies, and definition of done. Stop when they materially agree and every artifact is testable, or a decision needs the user.
claude-code · codex

Use this when

Use this before building a new software project when its idea or early documents still leave important implementation decisions open to interpretation.

How it runs

  1. Inventory the current project documents and identify the missing requirements, technical design, task breakdown, acceptance criteria, or test strategy needed before implementation.
  2. Find the single largest gap, contradiction, or vague requirement that could make competent engineers build different systems, then close it with concrete detail traceable to a stated requirement.
  3. Record assumptions that can be made safely, ask the user about genuine product forks, and recheck every edited document against the others for consistency.
  4. Have two independent reviewers describe the intended components, data model, dependencies, and definition of done; repeat until their descriptions materially agree or a required decision blocks progress.

Done when

Two independent reviewers derive substantially the same build from the project documents. Their descriptions agree on the components, data model, dependencies, and definition of done, and every required artifact is specific, consistent, traceable, and testable.

Why it works

A concrete convergence test exposes ambiguity that a single author may read past. Fixing one divergence at a time keeps the documents coherent and turns project preparation into evidence that another engineer can follow rather than a pile of planning text.

Implementation note

Do not add detail merely to make the documents longer or invent product requirements to force agreement. Keep every claim tied to a stated requirement, record assumptions, and return unresolved product choices to the user.

Source: Forward Future

More docs loops

Changelog generation from commits

/goalloopreponew

Turn the commit history since the last release tag into a human-readable, categorized CHANGELOG entry ready for the next version.

prompt
→ Claude
/goal CHANGELOG.md has a complete entry for the next release — read every commit since the last version tag, group changes into Added, Changed, Fixed, and Removed, write user-facing descriptions (not commit messages), link PR numbers, and flag anything that looks like a breaking change; stop after 5 turns
docslow risk

Keep docs in sync with main

/schedulenew

On every push to main, check whether changed code drifted from the docs in /docs and open a PR fixing anything out of date.

prompt
→ Claude
/schedule on every push to main, check whether the changed code drifted from the docs in /docs, and open a PR fixing anything out of date
docshigh risk

Fix doc drift, ship a PR

/scheduleForward Futurenew

Compare every doc against the current code, fix what's stale, verify commands and links, and open a reviewable PR.

prompt
→ Claude
Whenever a documentation pass is needed, review the codebase in full and make sure all documentation reflects the current implementation. Update stale documentation, verify the changes, then open a pull request.
docslow risk