/loopqualitymedium riskintermediatesafety B · 85Forward Futurepre-dates current gate · under review

Repair accessibility, highest-impact first

Confirm barriers against an agreed standard, fix the one with the greatest user impact, and rerun the same checks.

prompt
→ Claude
Check [scope] against [accessibility standard, such as WCAG 2.2 AA] with automated scans and available keyboard, screen-reader, and other manual tests. Confirm each issue, rank it by harm, and fix the highest-impact blocker. Rerun the same checks, affected task, and regression tests. Keep only verified fixes. Stop when no blocker remains, progress stalls, verification is unavailable, or approval is required. Never silence a check or weaken the target. Return issues, fixes, evidence, exceptions, and untested needs.
claude-code · codex

Use this when

Use this when a website or app has a defined accessibility target and you can repeatedly test the relevant pages, components, or tasks for people using keyboards, screen readers, zoom, or other access methods.

How it runs

  1. Choose the pages, components, and user tasks to test; name the accessibility standard, such as WCAG 2.2 AA; and list the automated scans and manual checks that are actually available.
  2. Run the baseline, reproduce each finding instead of trusting a tool warning by itself, and rank confirmed barriers by the number of people affected and how severely they are blocked.
  3. Fix the most harmful barrier with the smallest underlying change, then repeat the same scan, manual check, user task, and relevant regression tests.
  4. Keep only verified fixes and repeat until no confirmed barrier remains or progress stalls, evidence cannot be collected, work is blocked, or approval is required.

Done when

No confirmed accessibility barrier remains in the agreed pages, components, or user tasks. The same automated scans, available manual checks, affected user task, and regression tests pass after each retained fix without lowering the chosen accessibility standard.

Why it works

A fixed scope and repeated checks keep accessibility work tied to real people and reproducible evidence instead of an endless score chase. Fixing the most harmful confirmed barrier first directs effort to the users who are blocked most severely.

Implementation note

Automated tools can find likely problems but cannot prove a product is accessible. Manual keyboard use, screen-reader checks, zoom, contrast review, and real user testing may still be needed. Record anything the available test setup could not cover.

Source: Forward Future

More quality loops

Karpathy-Style CLAUDE.md Self-Check Protocol for Loops

A self-check protocol embedded in CLAUDE.md that every loop iteration obeys before ending a turn: re-read the goal, diff the changes against it, run the verification command, and state what remains — a ritual that catches drift between iterations.

prompt
→ Claude
Preamble rules embedded in CLAUDE.md that every loop iteration obeys: before ending a turn, re-read the goal, diff your changes against it, run the verification command, and explicitly state what remains — a self-check ritual that catches drift between iterations. (Community template descended from Andrej Karpathy's circulated CLAUDE.md rules.)
qualitymedium risk

Clean up the slop

/goalnew

Review your recent diff for debug code, dead branches, and bad names, then fix with minimal edits until lint and tests pass.

prompt
→ Claude
/goal the recent diff is clean and convention-aligned — review it for debug code, dead branches, and bad names, fix with minimal edits until `npm run lint && npm test` passes; stop after 4 turns
qualitylow risk

Run zero-config stop gate

/goalnew

Run the stop gate condition to judge loop completion; use judge.sh only for cross-model or off-plan evaluation.

prompt
→ Claude
/goal <condition (zero-config Stop gate) | judge.sh only for cross-model / off-plan judging |
qualitymedium risk