Agent-Loop-Skills bundle — loop until it's better

Six verification-gated loops in one open-standard skill bundle — autoresearch, scientific writing, data analysis, code/SQL/prompt optimization, and red-teaming — portable across Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor. Use the red-teaming loop only against systems you own and are authorized to test.

prompt
→ Claude Code
"Loop until it's better" — verification-gated loops for autoresearch, scientific writing, data analysis, code/SQL/prompt optimization, red-teaming, packaged as open-standard Agent Skills portable across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor. Cap the run at 25 iterations; leave remaining work for the next session.
claude-code

Implementation note

When to use: you want verification-gated looping across more domains than code — the bundle covers autoresearch, scientific writing, data analysis, code, SQL, and prompt optimization, plus red-teaming, in one install. How it works: six loops packaged as open-standard Agent Skills, portable across Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor. Each follows the same loop-until-it-is-better contract: iterate, check the result against a verification gate, and continue only while the gate says the artifact genuinely improved — the same anti-self-grading structure applied per domain. Safety: verification gates are the common rail across all six loops. The red-teaming loop carries its own explicit boundary: use it only against systems you own and are authorized to test — pointing an autonomous adversarial loop at anything else is out of bounds regardless of intent. As with any skill bundle, read each skill before first run and apply your own iteration caps around it.

Source: gaasher/Agent-Loop-Skills ↗graded C · 65/100 — how grades work →

More quality loops

Clean up the slop

Loop/goalcommunityA

Review your recent diff for debug code, dead branches, and bad names, then fix with minimal edits until lint and tests pass.

prompt
→ Claude Code
/goal the recent diff is clean and convention-aligned — review it for debug code, dead branches, and bad names, fix with minimal edits until `npm run lint && npm test` passes; stop after 4 turns

Repair accessibility, highest-impact first

Confirm barriers against an agreed standard, fix the one with the greatest user impact, and rerun the same checks.

prompt
→ Claude Code
Check [scope] against [accessibility standard, such as WCAG 2.2 AA] with automated scans and available keyboard, screen-reader, and other manual tests. Confirm each issue, rank it by harm, and fix the highest-impact blocker. Rerun the same checks, affected task, and regression tests. Keep only verified fixes. Stop when no blocker remains, progress stalls, verification is unavailable, or approval is required. Never silence a check or weaken the target. Return issues, fixes, evidence, exceptions, and untested needs.

Fifteen-minute verification report while you work

Loop/loopGitHubAnew

A recurring six-phase check (build, types, lint, tests with coverage, secret and debug-log grep, diff size) that prints one fixed-format report every fifteen minutes so you catch drift before the PR, not in review. It is strictly read-only: the loop reports, you decide what to fix. It exits when the tests pass and the report reads READY twice running, escalates instead of retrying when the same check fails three times, and stops after eight checks no matter what. Adapted from ECC's verification-loop skill (affaan-m/ECC, MIT), whose 'continuous mode' names the cadence but has no turn cap, exit, or failure path; all three are added here.

prompt
→ Claude Code
/loop every 15 minutes while I work: run `npm run build`, `npx tsc --noEmit`, `npm run lint`, and `npm test -- --coverage`, then grep src/ for `sk-`, `api_key`, and `console.log`, then `git diff --stat`. Print a VERIFICATION REPORT with Build / Types / Lint / Tests (X/Y passed, Z% coverage) / Security / Diff as PASS or FAIL and an overall READY or NOT READY for PR verdict, plus an Issues to Fix list. Report only — never edit files, never commit. Exit when `npm test` exits 0 and the report says READY twice in a row. If the same check FAILs on three consecutive passes, stop and escalate to me with the failing output instead of retrying. Stop after 8 checks regardless.